PAPERS

Cardiac contractility modulation by electric currents applied during the refractory period in patients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

C Pappone, S Rosanio, D Burkhoff, Y Mika, G Vicedomini, G Augello, I Shemer, D Prutchi, W Haddad, R Aviv, Y Snir, I Kronzon, O Alfieri and SA Ben Haim
American Journal of Cardiology 2002;90:1307-1313

We assessed the feasibility of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) by electric currents applied during the refractory period in patients with heart failure (HF). Extracellular electric currents modulating action potential and calcium transients have been shown to potentiate myocardial contractility in vitro and in animal models of chronic HF. CCM signals were biphasic square-wave pulses with adjustable amplitude, duration, and time delay from sensing of local electric activity. Signals were applied to the left ventricle through an epicardial vein (in 12 patients) or to the right ventricular (RV) aspect of the septum endocardially (in 6 patients). Simultaneous left ventricular (LV) and aortic pressure measurements were performed using a Millar catheter (Millar Instruments, Houston, Texas). Hemodynamics during RV temporary dual-chamber pacing was regarded as the control condition. Both LV and RV CCM stimulation increased dP/dtmax to a similar degree (9.1 + 4.5% and 7.1 + 0.8%, respectively; p <0.01 vs controls), with associated aortic pulse pressure changes of 10.3 + 7.2% and 10.8 + 1.1% (p <0.01 vs controls). Regional systolic wall motion assessed quantitatively by color kinesis echocardiography was markedly enhanced near the CCM electrode, and the area of increased contractility involved 4.6 + 1.2 segments per patient. In 6 patients with HF with left bundle branch block, CCM signals delivered during biventricular pacing (BVP) produced an additional 16.1 + 3.7% increase in dP/dtmax and a 17.0 + 7.5% increase in pulse pressure compared with BVP alone (p <0.01). CCM stimulation in patients with HF enhanced regional and global measures of LV systolic function, regardless of the varied delivery chamber or whether modulation was performed during RV pacing or BVP.

 

Tags: ,

Download Full Paper

« Back to Papers